Quantifying the direction and magnitude of CO2 flux in estuaries is necessary to constrain the global carbon cycle, yet carbonate systems and CO2 flux in subtropical and urbanized estuaries are not yet fully determined. To estimate the CO2 flux for Galveston Bay, a subtropical estuary located in the northwestern Gulf of Mexico proximal to the Houston-Galveston metroplex, monthly cruises were conducted along a transect extending from the Houston ship channel to the mouth of Galveston Bay and Gulf...
Show moreField sampling
Galveston Bay is a semi-enclosed microtidal estuary located in the nwGOM [42]. With an average water depth of 3 m and surface area covering 1554 km2, Galveston Bay is the seventh largest estuary in the U.S. and the second largest estuary on the Texas coast [35, 43, 44]. Galveston Bay receives freshwater from the Trinity River, San Jacinto River, Clear Creek, and smaller bayous and creeks, with the Trinity River providing 70% of the freshwater entering the Bay [35, 45, 43, 44]. The Bolivar Peninsula and Galveston Island separate Galveston Bay from the GOM, with exchange of water between the Bay and the GOM occurring through Bolivar Roads, i.e., the mouth of the Bay [46, 43].
Monthly cruises were conducted between October 2017 and September 2018 on board the R/V Trident. Timing of the study allowed for examination of the factors regulating CO2 flux over the course of a year following Hurricane Harvey in late August of 2017. Although the study began more than 45 days (the residence time of the Bay) after Harvey, salinity recovery of the Bay was likely still ongoing in the inner and middle sections of the Bay [47, 48].
During each monthly survey, a transect was run between five water sampling stations, extending northwest from the Bay mouth (Station 1) opening to the Five Mile Marker on the Houston Ship Channel (Station 5). One offshore cruise in the nwGOM outside Galveston Bay was conducted in October of 2018.
Pigments
Chlorophyll-a concentrations were analyzed from surface water samples collected at each station in the Bay as in [65]. Surface waters were filtered through GF/F filters, which were frozen immediately in liquid nitrogen and later stored in the freezer at -80 ⁰C until analysis. Extraction of pigments from filters followed procedures from [66, 67], whereby filters were extracted in acetone in polypropylene centrifuge tubes, which were sonicated for 15 min in a sonicator (Model FS 60, Fisher Scientific). Acetone extract was filtered through a syringe filter (0–2 μm Nylon filter). Procedures were repeated for sample filters, and the two extracts (total 6 mL) were combined and blown with nitrogen gas under ice to dryness [68], and acetone (0.5 mL) was added to dissolve the residue before the high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis [65].
Pigments were analyzed using a Shimadzu HPLC system with a reverse phase column (Agilent Eclipse XDB-C8, 3.5 μm particle size, 150 mm length x 4.6 mm diameter), with photodiode array (PDA) detector set as 450 nm. The mobile phases included A (70:30 v/v methanol: 28 mM tetrabutyl ammonium acetate; pH 6.5) and B methanol (100%). After sample injection (400 μL, mixing 0.5 mL acetone extract and 1.25 mL 28 mM tetrabutylammonium acetate), a gradient program (1.0 mL/min) began with 5% B and increased to 95% B in 22 min, then to 95% B isocratically over 30 min. All chromatographic separations were performed in a column oven set at 60 ⁰C. Pigments were identified by comparing retention times with authentic standards purchased from DHI (Denmark) or Sigma-Aldritch (USA). Peak areas were converted to concentrations based on response factors calculated from authentic standards. Duplicate analyses of the same extract generally agreed within 20%.
Liu, H., Hu, X., Dias, L. M. (2024) Galveston Bay Pigments. Biological and Chemical Oceanography Data Management Office (BCO-DMO). (Version 1) Version Date 2024-11-19 [if applicable, indicate subset used]. http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset/943964 [access date]
Terms of Use
This dataset is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.
If you wish to use this dataset, it is highly recommended that you contact the original principal investigators (PI). Should the relevant PI be unavailable, please contact BCO-DMO (info@bco-dmo.org) for additional guidance. For general guidance please see the BCO-DMO Terms of Use document.